ZyXEL Communications PLA-470 V2 - V3.0.5 Installationsanleitung Seite 23

  • Herunterladen
  • Zu meinen Handbüchern hinzufügen
  • Drucken
  • Seite
    / 349
  • Inhaltsverzeichnis
  • LESEZEICHEN
  • Bewertet. / 5. Basierend auf Kundenbewertungen
Seitenansicht 22
For European countries, this is a fundamental level since the international stan-
dards, the specifications of which will be used as a reference for CE marking, are
written in the European standardization committees.
For a better understanding of the mechanisms for the implementation of inter-
national standards in a broad sense, this European standardization organization
should be compared with the existing organization in the United-States.
Citing the “Overview of the U.S. Standardization System” (ANSI, Second Edi-
tion, July 2007), the United States is very different from other countries of the world,
where usually one organization is designated as the major standards developer and
that organization is closely tied to, if not a part of, the government. There are many
organizations that comprise the U.S. standardization system, including both govern-
ment and non-government organizations.
In the United States, there are essentially two broad categories of standards with
regard to regulation—mandatory and voluntary. Mandatory standards are set by the
government and can be either procurement or regulatory standards. A procurement
standard sets out the requirements that must be met by government suppliers; regulatory
standards may set health, safety, environmental, or other criteria.
VOLUNTARY STANDARDS—In the United States, the voluntary standards
development system is called voluntary for two reasons. First, participation in the
system is voluntary. Second, the standards produced are usually intended for volun-
tary use. Voluntary consensus standards are developed through the participation of
all interested stakeholders, including producers, users, consumers, and representa-
tives of government and academia.
In the United States, the distinction between voluntary and mandatory stan-
dards is not clear cut. Often, government standards developers refer in their regula-
tions to privately developed standards, and in that reference give the standard the
force of federal support. Building codes, for example, reference hundreds of stan-
dards developed by voluntary standards organizations. Since building codes are the
province of government, the referenced standards have the force of law and must be
adhered to by regulatory agencies such as the Federal Aviation Administration, the
Environmental Protection Agency, and the Food and Drug Administration. The
Department of Housing and Urban Development also references hundreds, if not
thousands, of voluntary consensus standards in lieu of developing its own docu-
ments. These too, have the force of law once they are referenced in a government
regulation. In the wake of the U.S. National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (Public Law 104-113), which requires government agencies to use privately
developed standards whenever it is at all possible, this practice is on the increase,
saving taxpayers millions of dollars previously incurred by duplicating efforts in
standards development.
What Kinds of Standards Are There?
There are at least four kinds of standards, based on the degree of consensus needed
for their development and use, based on “The Handbook of Standardization”
(ASTM, April 2006):
4 Introduction
Seitenansicht 22
1 2 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 348 349

Kommentare zu diesen Handbüchern

Keine Kommentare